⁦Infrastructure profile⁩⁦Active⁩

⁦Sechahun Iron Ore Mine⁩

⁦The mine is reported to comprise anomalies X and XI⁩. ⁦Academic sources describe mainly low-titanium magnetite-apatite mineralisation in central Iranian Precambrian formations of volcanic-sedimentary origin⁩. ⁦Anomaly XI is reported to contain approximately 140 Mt of low-grade iron ore at 36⁩% ⁦Fe⁩, ⁦while ore in Anomaly X is reported at up to 67⁩% ⁦Fe⁩. ⁦These figures are geological references and do not establish current mineable reserves⁩, ⁦production capacity or saleable output⁩.

⁦Status⁩⁦Active⁩
⁦Verification⁩⁦Basic⁩
⁦Confidence⁩⁦Medium⁩
⁦Updated⁩19/07/2026
⁦Strategic Layer⁩

⁦Strategic and market-access role⁩

⁦Sechahun Iron Ore Mine matters in the Hormuz Graph as another iron-ore node in the Bafq mining district⁩, ⁦where extraction⁩, ⁦processing demand⁩, ⁦rail and road logistics⁩, ⁦and steel-sector material flows are concentrated⁩. ⁦Its role connects Yazd’s mining base to Iran’s broader iron and steel input chain⁩, ⁦alongside nearby assets such as Choghart⁩, ⁦Mishdovan⁩, ⁦Chadormalu⁩, ⁦and other central Iranian mineral operations⁩. ⁦The asset is relevant because it adds site-level granularity to the Bafq cluster and highlights constraints around water⁩, ⁦energy⁩, ⁦environmental management⁩, ⁦and freight reliability⁩.

⁦OPERATING PROFILE⁩

⁦Operations⁩, ⁦capacity⁩ &⁦amp⁩; ⁦connectivity⁩

⁦Related use cases⁩

⁦Useful for iron-ore supply-chain mapping⁩, ⁦mining-services screening⁩, ⁦equipment and maintenance demand analysis⁩, ⁦materials sourcing⁩, ⁦freight-route review⁩, ⁦and environmental-risk assessment around Bafq⁩. ⁦Analysts can compare Sechahun with other Yazd iron-ore assets to identify service demand⁩, ⁦processing links⁩, ⁦and logistics constraints⁩. ⁦Site-level due diligence should verify current operations⁩, ⁦ore handling arrangements⁩, ⁦rail or road access⁩, ⁦procurement channels⁩, ⁦water exposure⁩, ⁦and compliance requirements⁩.

⁦Industries served⁩

⁦Iron ore mining⁩; ⁦mining services⁩; ⁦iron and steel supply chains⁩.

⁦CONTROL⁩ &⁦amp⁩; ⁦DEVELOPMENT⁩

⁦Ownership⁩, ⁦operation⁩ &⁦amp⁩; ⁦expansion⁩

⁦Owner and operator⁩

⁦Operator⁩: ⁦Strongly associated with Central Iron Ore Company of Iran⁩ (⁦ICIOC⁩); ⁦the current operator and detailed ownership structure were not independently confirmed⁩.

⁦DECISION RISKS⁩

⁦Constraints⁩, ⁦risk⁩ &⁦amp⁩; ⁦compliance⁩

⁦Operational constraints⁩

⁦The ore bodies are reported to be structurally complex⁩, ⁦with several fault lines affecting mineralisation⁩. ⁦Current water⁩, ⁦energy⁩, ⁦environmental and logistics conditions were not verified in the evidence reviewed⁩.

⁦Key risks and compliance considerations⁩

⁦Decision-makers should verify current operating status⁩, ⁦production⁩, ⁦mine planning⁩, ⁦water and energy requirements⁩, ⁦access arrangements⁩, ⁦environmental management and commercial offtake conditions⁩.

⁦Related context⁩

⁦Connected Intelligence⁩

⁦Relevant geography⁩, ⁦industry⁩, ⁦market and execution context for this profile⁩.

⁦Common questions⁩

⁦Frequently asked questions⁩

⁦Direct answers to the questions most likely to arise when reviewing this profile⁩.

⁦Where is Sechahun Iron Ore Mine located⁩?

⁦The mine is approximately 47 kilometres northeast of Bafq in Yazd Province⁩, ⁦Iran⁩, ⁦within the Bafq mining district⁩.

⁦What mineralisation is reported at Sechahun Iron Ore Mine⁩?

⁦Academic sources describe mainly low-titanium magnetite-apatite mineralisation⁩. ⁦The mine is reported to include two principal anomalies⁩, ⁦X and XI⁩.

⁦What reserve and grade figures have been reported⁩?

⁦A 2023 academic source reports approximately 140 Mt of low-grade iron ore at 36⁩% ⁦Fe for Anomaly XI⁩, ⁦while Anomaly X is reported to contain ore grading up to 67⁩% ⁦Fe⁩. ⁦These are geological references rather than verified current production or saleable-output figures⁩.

⁦Who operates Sechahun Iron Ore Mine⁩?

⁦The mine is strongly associated with Central Iron Ore Company of Iran⁩ (⁦ICIOC⁩), ⁦but the current operator and detailed ownership structure require independent confirmation⁩.